Report Conversion 2004 to 2015

SOLVED

My company upgraded Timeslips to 2015 from 2004.  2004 was very stable and error free until we upgraded our PCs to 64 bit, etc.  Anyway, the layouts for my billing reports did not appear to convert properly.  I can see my custom layout in the Billing Statement Layout List but when I open it, it looks like a default report.  I did not set up these reports so maybe Layout 00001 is a typical report.  But all of my client accounts reference either Layout 00001 or one of the other reports in the list, which are also incorrect.

Parents
  • 0

    Not surprising as there have been lots of changes to the bill layout functionality along the way!  The later Timeslips versions use .tsl files for the layouts where the earlier versions like your previous 2004 used .rpt files.  My best advice is that you will need to find those RPT files and import them to TSL files individually and then assign to your clients.  Note the import/export toolbits on the right hand toolbar of the bill and statement layout list you included above.

Reply
  • 0

    Not surprising as there have been lots of changes to the bill layout functionality along the way!  The later Timeslips versions use .tsl files for the layouts where the earlier versions like your previous 2004 used .rpt files.  My best advice is that you will need to find those RPT files and import them to TSL files individually and then assign to your clients.  Note the import/export toolbits on the right hand toolbar of the bill and statement layout list you included above.

Children
  • 0 in reply to AllenH

    That's what I thought too about importing the .rpt.  However, it appears that the bill layout was saved internally within Timeslips.  I cannot find a .rpt file that has the same name as the bill layouts saved for each client.  I did a *.rpt search within the directory and could not find it.

  • 0 in reply to SteveO

    As Caren suggested your most cost effective approach may be to recreate your layouts from scratch.  When you do so give some thought to the naming convention.  Use standard bill for example and perhaps use client names when you use the standard to morph to something special for a particular client.  That way you don't get stuck with "layout001" and wonder what the heck that name means.