Hi Kevin, Would a format of MM/DD/YY work?  We won't change the font to anything smaller than 8, the feedback on the smaller font was very decisive. Thanks John

John,

That is not something I can answer for everyone.  We have some customers who use DD/MM/YYYY (the standard in Canada), and others who use YYYY-MM-DD.  Forcing a shorter date (instead of using workstation date format) would work technically, but make some people unhappy (forcing us to edit their report with every upgrade, PU).

I'd think using some of the available white-space would be a better, but again that is not something I can answer for everyone.

John,

That is not something I can answer for everyone.  We have some customers who use DD/MM/YYYY (the standard in Canada), and others who use YYYY-MM-DD.  Forcing a shorter date (instead of using workstation date format) would work technically, but make some people unhappy (forcing us to edit their report with every upgrade, PU).

I'd think using some of the available white-space would be a better, but again that is not something I can answer for everyone.

HI Kevin, It will be addressed in the next 2022 PU.

Thanks John.

John,

Am I correct that this will be PU3? I looked at PU2 Release Notes and didn't see it was addressed. Also, I just got an email from a client about the Daily Sales Order Sales Journal with the same problem on the first line - Salesperson, Batch No, Tax Schedule.

Thanks,

Suzanne.

Hi Suzanne, You are correct 2022 PU3 and 2023.   We'll also take a look at the  Daily Sales Order Sales Journal. Thanks John

John,

You might also want to look at the payroll reports. A client just sent me this screenshot where department is misspelled.

Thanks suzmwatson, we'lll have a review of those as well. 

suzmwatson - this will be fixed on the next Payroll release.

Hi Suzanne, Thank you. We will get this one as well