So there is another issue which was not addressed by this fix - the use of the NOF vendor in a Manual Check.  The client is changing the name on the Manual Check Entry, but NOT ON FILE VENDOR is passing through to Bank Reconciliation.

I just tried it in 2019.  My modified name updated to B/R.

I changed the NOF vendor name to John Smith in Manual Check Entry, then update the register.

Bank Rec has the name John Smith (last record in grid)

Natasha

And then again, perhaps the client has told me something incorrectly (grits teeth).  I will verify and get back with you if needed.  If you don't hear from me - all is well.  THANK YOU!

AND, hold that mic.  So if I do a NOF on the client's system, it works.  If the end user does one, it does not.  I have looked at every role option on all 3 tabs for AP, BR, GL, LM, and CI and I don't see anything indicating that it should work differently for her than I.  We did this all on her machine, so there wasn't anything different there - I just logged into Sage as me. SO - what option makes it not work???????

Take that mic back....  :-)

When you end user did it, did they print the manual check and select 'Print Remit To Information'?  If you print remit to, the remit to name, not the name you entered in manual check entry, updates to B/R.  The remit to name is PayeeName$ in AP_ManualCheckHeader.

In my example below, 'NOT ON FILE VENDOR' updated to B/R  'Mary' is the name I entered in data entry.

I will have to connect again with the customer.  I connected just now and when I went into check printing, the Remit To check box was checked so I ASSUME that it was with the client, but I will have to verify.  Also, when I did it, I didn't actually print the check - I entered a check number and did not print.  So - why would Sage assume it should use the name on a check entered after the fact but require the Remit to be checked if you are printing?  (But I still am betting the client had Remit checked, anyway, so still in the same spot...)

If they have that check box selected, they must have modified the @VendorOrRemitToName formula in the check form to print the vendor name for NOF vendor.  Otherwise, the check would print 'NOT ON FILE VENDOR'. 

They can go to Vendor Maintenance and clear the Remit To name for the NOF vendor.  If the PayeeName$ in the check header record is blank, update will write the VendorName$ to B/R.

If they have that check box selected, they must have modified the @VendorOrRemitToName formula in the check form to print the vendor name for NOF vendor.  Otherwise, the check would print 'NOT ON FILE VENDOR'. 

They can go to Vendor Maintenance and clear the Remit To name for the NOF vendor.  If the PayeeName$ in the check header record is blank, update will write the VendorName$ to B/R.

Not sure what is going on, but I cleared the NOF vendor name in Vendor Maintenance and logged in as the client it put the right name in Bank Rec, so I'm going to have her try it one more time.  If it works for me, logged in as her, and doesn't work for her, I'm going to switch professions.