Canadian Payroll PIER Report

Was wondering if anyone else has run the PIER Report in Canadian Payroll for 2018 calendar year in Payroll 7.3 with the latest tax table?

A couple of users are reporting that the CPP columns that are showing a discrepancy are not taking the 3500 exemption into consideration.

Parents Reply Children
  • 0 in reply to Abenaki Ottawa

    Thanks - That's great!  Now I need to figure out why the difference in CPP Contributions and CPP Expected.....

    Thanks for the help.

  • 0 in reply to Ric S

    I think it might have to do with the 3500 exemption mentioned at the top of this string....

  • 0 in reply to Ric S

    When printing the CPP and EI Balancing Report - make sure that you are selecting the correct pay frequency.  This frequency is used to calculate the correct amount of CPP and EI that is required.  If the pay frequency is incorrect, the report will show invalid figures.  Also ensure that you are entering the correct Pay Cycle Number. The pay cycle number refers to the number of pay periods that have been processed.  For example, in a bi-weekly pay frequency, you would enter 26 in the pay cycle number field if the whole year has been completed.  

    If you change the pay frequency and the pay cycle numbers, you will see different results on your report. 

  • 0 in reply to The Equation Team

    I have entered the report parameters appropriately. 

    I'm not sure how useful this report is, considering employee turnover / partial year earnings.  Perhaps that is why there is no total at the bottom of the columns.  EI seems to work well, but CPP is consistently out.