The financial follow-up of the PJM module claims to be prepared to represent outputs of other modules of the system, from purchases and sales movements typed with the type of cost present in the article or DEFAULT if it has no registered, time management, expense notes, also type of cost.
However in the case of invoices from third-party suppliers and third-party customers, the same does not happen since the system can not type the cost type and puts everything in the same place. From a management point of view it does not make any sense in the other modules to be able to typify each movement and in these cases not to be. The rule should be the same.
The queries used by this structure, if we look closely, invoke a PCCCOD field that does not exist in any of the business partner tables. The manual itself describes that financial costs are considered by the cost type defined for the entire query and not in a field that does not even exist.
This problem was presented to Sage, which considers that it should be submitted as a suggestion for improvement, however in our view this is a module design error.
My client considers that everything can not be analyzed as being the same cost if it is not and requires a similar option as the rest.
Anyone else agree or have the same problem?
